USPTO serial 88274977
LA PEQUEÑA GRAN DIFERENCIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA PEQUEÑA GRAN DIFERENCIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan M. House
Dyan M. House Baker & McKenzie, LLP1900 N. Pearl Street, Suite 1500Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat extracts; meat preserves; vegetable preserves; soups and bouillons including paste bouillons and granulated bouillons; frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; instant, de-hydrated and frozen soups; stock including stock cubes; tomato pastes and vegetable granules for use in prepared food; vegetable purees and tomato puree, vegetable pastes, tomato paste and vegetable pastes featuring herbs; pickles; snack meals and instant snack food, namely, packaged meal kits consisting principally of meat, poultry, vegetables, processed seafood and/or eggs; prepared ready-to-eat foods made from meat, poultry, vegetables, processed seafood and/or eggs; cooked and preserved alimentary products consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; chilled and frozen, ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; ready-to-eat meals and packaged instant meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Ham glazes; soup garnishing, namely, croutons, crackers, processed herbs and combinations thereof; vanilla flavorings for food and beverages; seasonings, seasoning mixes, dehydrated seasonings, seasoning pastes; marinades; curry pastes; gravy mixes; taco shells; tortillas and noodles; rice; pasta, filled pasta; crackers; poppadoms; sauces including those in frozen, wet and dry formats; dehydrated sauce mixes; chilled, frozen and ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of processed cereals, rice, pasta or noodles; snack meals and instant snack foods consisting primarily of processed cereals, rice, pasta or noodles; instant snack foods made from processed cereals and flour; ready-to-use mixtures for the preparation of dishes and sauces, namely, curry spice mixture; ready-to-cook foods made from processed cereals and flour; ready-to-cook foods consisting principally of rice, pasta or noodles; rice dishes and potato dishes, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of rice; dried, cooked and preserved alimentary products, namely, processed cereals, flour, rice, pasta, noodles, and alimentary pastes; ready-cooked meals and instant meals made predominantly from processed cereals, rice, pasta or noodles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Knorr-Nahrmittel Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Knorr-Nahrmittel Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LA PEQUEÑA GRAN DIFERENCIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |