USPTO serial 88276344
THE INTERNET FAST LANE FOR GAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANGUBAT, ALEXANDER GEORGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE INTERNET FAST LANE FOR GAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen McArthur
STEPHEN MCARTHUR THE MCARTHUR LAW FIRM, PC11400 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD, SUITE 200LOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for use optimizing internet traffic and bandwidth, for optimizing real time packet transit over the internet, for optimizing and making more efficient packet transit for online multiplayer video games, for organizing and selling real-time packet transit across the internet, for avoiding internet traffic congestion, for selling packet transit and server infrastructure services, for creating a marketplace to buy and sell packet transit across the internet, for video game networking services, for network security, and for detecting, preventing, and for mitigating distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for optimizing internet traffic and bandwidth, for optimizing real time packet transit over the internet, for optimizing and making more efficient packet transit for online multiplayer video games, for organizing and selling real-time packet transit across the internet, for avoiding internet traffic congestion, for selling packet transit and server infrastructure services, for creating a marketplace to buy and sell packet transit across the internet, for video game networking services, for network security, and for detecting, preventing, and for mitigating distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks | ACTIVE | Jan 22, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |