USPTO serial 88276699
NINJA NOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NINJA NOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Oppenhuizen
David L. Oppenhuizen Oppenhuizen Law PLC5960 Tahoe Dr. SESte. 105Grand Rapids, MI 49546Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable applications for mobile phones and handheld computers to enable on-line ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and delivery of food products; computer software for coordinating transport of cargo by motorized vehicles; computer software for coordinating, purchasing, and obtaining food and beverage delivery services; computer software for engaging and coordinating transportation services, namely, software for the automated scheduling and dispatch of motorized vehicles; computer software for engaging and coordinating delivery and payment services, namely, software for the automated scheduling, purchase, and dispatch of deliveries | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | providing a website featuring on-line ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and delivery of food products; advertising services, namely, promoting and marketing the goods and services of others in the field of restaurants via print and electronic media | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | food delivery services; delivery of goods by automobile; delivery of goods by bicycle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 28, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |