USPTO serial 88279448
Serial No. 88279448
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 88279448?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TODD M OBERDICK
TODD M OBERDICK FORGE IP PLLC1077 BRIDGEPORT AVE SUITE 301SHELTON, CT 06484UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | actuators for rocker switches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 30, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |