USPTO serial 88279461
ROYAL BASTARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROYAL BASTARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia K. Sutherland
JEFFREY H BROWN MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP444 W LAKE STREETSUITE 3200CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; Non-alcoholic beer flavored beverages; coffee flavored soft drinks; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Semi-frozen carbonated beverages; Mineral and aerated waters beverages; Aerated mineral waters; Soft drinks; Fruit juices and fruit drinks; Carbonated non-alcoholic drinks; Syrups used in the preparation of soft drinks; Non-alcoholic cider; Soft drinks, namely, carbonated soft drinks, low calorie soft drinks, non-carbonated soft drinks, all being infused with herbs; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |