USPTO serial 88280438
ROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric J. von Vorys
ERIC J VON VORYS SHULMAN ROGERS GANDAL PORDY AND ECKER PA12505 PARK POTOMAC AVENUE SIXTH FLOORPOTOMAC, MD 20854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting, business management consulting and advisory services in the field of business and leadership execution and leadership and management development; business consultation in the field of business leadership development; business strategy consulting services in the field of business and leadership execution and leadership and management development; business management consultation for the implementation of strategic plans; business organizational consultation; business management consultation featuring business management effectiveness; business management consultation in the field of leadership and management and strategy execution | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services in the field of business and leadership execution and leadership and management development featuring software for accessing data and information applying artificial intelligence driven technology and mobile application technology in the field of business technology, leadership and management technology, strategy technology, strategy execution technology, organizational technology, leadership and management effectiveness technology, leadership and management execution technology, project management technology, human capital management technology, B2B technology, customer relationship management technology, social platforms and digital communication platforms, project management software, productivity software, digital calendars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2020 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |