USPTO serial 88280717
KOBALT TEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOBALT TEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cell phone battery chargers; Cell phone battery chargers for use in vehicles; Cell phone cases; Light emitting diodes (LEDs); Wireless speakers; Wireless cellular phone headsets; Wireless chargers; Wireless charging pads for smartphones; Wireless ear buds; Wireless headsets for smartphones; Wireless indoor and outdoor speakers; Wireless receivers and transmitters for portable media players; Carrying cases for cell phones; Electric charging cables; Protective covers and cases for cell phones and portable media players | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2019 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |