Drawing for SILVERBACK

USPTO serial 88283057

SILVERBACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILVERBACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTINA E. BRULE

CHRISTINA E. BRULE HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRCLEALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical implants, namely, bone plates and bone fasteners made from artificial material for use in the foot and ankle; all the foregoing not containing silver materialACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 8, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 8, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 25, 2024EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 26, 2024RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 5, 2024GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2024GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2024CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 7, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 24, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 24, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 24, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 22, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
May 22, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 24, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 6, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 3, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 3, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance