USPTO serial 88286800
YAHUALICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADEYIGA, ADETAYO JANET
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YAHUALICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rafael Ruano
JUAN JOSE TORIS JUAN JOSE TORISAV EJERCITO NACIONAL 1162102MEXICO CITY, 11510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit conserves; Fruit peel; Fruit peels; Fruit preserved in alcohol; Fruit salads; Fruit, preserved; Fruit-based organic food snacks; Fruits in preserved form; Fruits preserved in alcohol; Fruits, canned; Fruits, tinned; Vegetable chips; Vegetable salads; Vegetables in vinegar; Vegetables, canned; Vegetables, cooked; Vegetables, dried; Vegetables, instant frozen; Vegetables, preserved; Vegetables, tinned; Arrangements of cut fruit; Arrangements of processed fruit; Bagged cut fruit; Bagged cut vegetables; Bagged sliced fruit; Bagged sliced vegetables; Blended vegetable oils for food; Bottled fruits; Bottled cut fruit; Bottled cut vegetables; Bottled sliced fruit; Bottled sliced vegetables; Candied fruit; Candied fruit snacks; Canned fruits; Canned vegetables; Canned cut fruit; Canned cut vegetables; Canned fruits and vegetables; Canned or bottled fruits; Canned or bottled vegetables; Canned sliced fruit; Canned sliced vegetables; Cooked vegetables; Cooked fruits and vegetables; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Dehydrated vegetables; Dried fruit mixes; Dried fruit-based snacks; Dried fruits; Dried fruits in powder form; Dried vegetables; Dried vegetables in powder form; Dried fruit and vegetables; Dry or aromatized fruit; Fermented fruits; Fermented vegetables; Freeze-dried fruits; Freeze-dried vegetables; Frosted fruits; Frozen fruits; Frozen vegetables; Fruit and vegetable salads; Fruit salads and vegetable salads; Lyophilised vegetables; Lyophilized vegetables; Meat, fish, fruit and vegetable preserves; Organic dehydrated fruit snacks; Pickled fruits; Pickled vegetables; Pickled vegetables in soy sauce, soybean paste or vinegar; Pre-cut vegetable salad; Preserved fruits; Preserved vegetables; Preserved vegetables (in oil); Preserved fruit and vegetables; Preserved fruits and vegetables; Preserved, dried and cooked vegetables; Preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; Preserved, dried, cooked and grilled vegetables; Preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; Preserved, frozen, dried or cooked vegetables; Processed fruit; Processed fruits; Processed vegetables; Processed vegetables and fruits; Salted vegetables; Sliced vegetables; Sliced vegetables preserved in soy sauce, soybean paste or vinegar; Tinned vegetables; Tinned meat, fish, vegetables and fruits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |