USPTO serial 88288323
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Commerce Township, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G Shariff
MICHAEL G SHARIFF INVENTA CAPITAL PLC40900 WOODWARD AVENUE SUITE 111BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Mouthwashes, not for medical purposes; Toothpaste; Toothpastes; Home dental care products for dogs and cats, namely, toothpaste; Non-medicated mouthwash and gargle; Non-medicated mouthwashes; Solid toothpaste tablets; Medicated dental floss; Medicated toothpaste; Dental floss; Dental floss dispensers; Dental floss picks; Dental flossers; Dental care kit comprising toothbrushes and floss; Floss for dental purposes; Toothbrush bristles; Toothbrush cases; Toothbrush head covers; Toothbrush holders; Toothbrushes, electric; Electric toothbrush replacement handles and recharging docks sold as a unit; Electric toothbrush replacement heads; Electric toothbrushes; Electrical toothbrushes; Heads for electric toothbrushes; Home dental care products for dogs and cats, namely, toothbrush; Manual toothbrushes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |