USPTO serial 88288528
BIOFLEX SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOFLEX SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francis C. Hand
FRANCIS C HAND CARELLA BYRNE ET AL5 BECKER FARM ROADROSELAND, NJ 07068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal clamps for tubing and hoses that are used for sealing, connecting and securing single use drug and liquid transfer tubing systems and transfer lines in the biotechnology production industry | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |