USPTO serial 88289891
GRID CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2023
- Examiner
- ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with GRID CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Perth, West Australia, AU
Perth, West Australia, AU
Perth, West Australia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Polcyn
Thomas A. Polcyn THOMPSON COBURN LLPONE US BANK PLAZAST. LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Batteries, battery chargers and battery eliminators, power boards in the nature of power strips, extension cables, electrical plugs, electric switches, electrical sockets, electrical socket outlets; anti-theft warning apparatus, namely, burglar alarms and burglar alarm monitoring systems; intrusion and theft detectors, namely, theft alarms; door intercoms; electric locks; electronic security devices and systems, namely, security control panels and motion detectors; security cameras; television monitoring apparatus and video screens in relation to security; lighting products, equipment and installations, namely, security lighting products for outdoor use, including halogen floodlights and spotlight units | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2023 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |