Drawing for HOLISTIK

USPTO serial 88290160

HOLISTIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MALYSZEK, KIMBERLY RAY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLISTIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRENDAN P. MCFEELY

Brendan P. McFeely Kane Kessler, P.C.600 Third Avenue35th FloorNew York, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplements, namely, powders, oral sprays; herbal tinctures for medical purposes; herbal tinctures for pets for medical purposes; dietary and nutritional supplements in the nature of gummies; dietary and nutritional supplements in the form of a drink shot for the purpose of aiding in recovery; nutritional supplements; medicated creams for treatment of pain and dermatological conditions; topical analgesic relief sticks; cannabidiol oil for medicinal use; all of the foregoing containing no more than trace amount of CBD derived solely from hempACTIVEFeb 5, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 25, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 4, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 4, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2021RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Oct 4, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 25, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 16, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 14, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 14, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 29, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 29, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 15, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 2, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2019AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2019PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance