Drawing for THE SLIME FACTORY

USPTO serial 88290245

THE SLIME FACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SLIME FACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Guerra

Richard Guerra The Brickell IP Group, PLLC1101 Brickell Ave, South Tower, Ste 800,Miami, FL 33131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Children entertainment and amusement centers, namely, interactive play areas, provided year-round at fixed retail locations; educational services for children, namely, workshops in the field of slime making, provided year-round at fixed retail locations; entertainment services for children, namely, facilitating interaction or play with slime, provided year-round at fixed retail locations; providing children's party centers for the purpose of entertaining children and celebrating birthdays, provided year-round at fixed retail locationsACTIVEJun 15, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 22, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 21, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 24, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 25, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 25, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 11, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 24, 2019LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
May 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance