USPTO serial 88290587
DIILI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIILI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
São Paulo - SP, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sylvia Mulholland
SYLVIA MULHOLLAND LAW OFFICE OF SYLVIA MULHOLLAND1450 2ND STREETSUITE #110SANTA MONICA, CA 90401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management, namely, inventory management of refrigeration equipment, asset management services in the nature of reporting on service histories, end of product life information, and replacement costs of refrigeration equipment; business management of commercial logistics for others; advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the commercial products for others through computer hardware and software in connection with refrigeration equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services related to technology solutions through the application of Internet of things (IoT), namely, designing and developing computer hardware and software and artificial intelligence for controlling, monitoring, evaluating and managing of refrigeration equipment of networks comprised by physical objects embedded with electronics in the nature of refrigeration equipment, using software, sensors, and network connectivity, which enables these objects to collect and exchange data; Cloud computing featuring software for use in corrective maintenance and equipment diagnoses of refrigeration apparatus, monitoring equipment energy efficiency, identifying best location for sales, equipment tracking, quality analysis and predictive maintenance for refrigeration apparatus; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in inventory management of refrigeration equipment, for use in corrective maintenance and equipment diagnoses of refrigeration apparatus, monitoring equipment energy efficiency, identifying best location for sales, equipment tracking, quality analysis and predictive maintenance for refrigeration apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |