Drawing for TARALUX

USPTO serial 88290922

TARALUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ONUOHA, UKACHUKWU FREDERICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TARALUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan Gugliotta, Esq.

Nathan Gugliotta, Esq. Gugliotta & Gugliotta, LPAP.O. Box 506Richfield, OH 44286UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for 3D imaging review and analysisACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for assisting with the interpretation of multi-modality, digital radiology images; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for 3D imaging review and analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 21, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 21, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 21, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 21, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 18, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance