USPTO serial 88291197
ARCADEUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIEBL, ALEXANDRA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARCADEUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Natter
Ben Natter HAUG PARTNERS, LLP745 Fifth AveNew York, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Online non-downloadable computer software for developers for creating video games utilizing blockchain technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |