USPTO serial 88291301
RAAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Torrey Livenick
3638 N MARION STDENVER, CO 80205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Management consulting and advisory services in the areas of corporate growth strategy, innovation and growth processes, organizational transformation, and talent management and development strategies | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2019 |
| 040 | Manufacturing process consulting | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2019 |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of information technology; Consulting in the field of IT project management; Consulting in the field of structural engineering; Consulting services in the field of industrial engineering; Consulting services in the field of office and workplace automation; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; Monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; Monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; Computer monitoring service which tracks application software performance, performs periodic maintenance and provides reports and alerts concerning such performance; Computer monitoring service which tracks hardware performance and processes and sends out historical reports and alerts; Computer security consultancy; Computer services, namely, monitoring and reporting on the performance, availability, and errors of web sites of others; Computer services, namely, monitoring the web sites of others to improve their scalability and performance; Computer services, namely, monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the web sites of others; Computer software consultation; Computer technology consultancy; Data security consultancy; Information technology consulting services; Internet security consultancy; IT consulting services; Technical support services, namely, 24/7 monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; Technical support, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems; Telecommunications engineering consultancy | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |