Drawing for PRO READY

USPTO serial 88291718

PRO READY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRO READY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danielle H. Bratek, Esq.

Danielle H. Bratek, Esq. Danielle H. Bratek, P.A.161 SE 12 StreetPompano Beach, FL 33060UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006non-electric cables and wires of common metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2019FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jul 26, 2019ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2019GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2019GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2019EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Apr 18, 2019CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance