Drawing for EUREKA

USPTO serial 88292816

EUREKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EUREKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JASON P MUELLER

JASON P MUELLER FISHERBROYLES LLP628 JULIA STREETNEW ORLEANS, LA 70130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Remotely operated vehicles for underwater inspectionsACTIVEMar 5, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 9, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 9, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 22, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 4, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 23, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 23, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 9, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 24, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 22, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance