USPTO serial 88293713
INFINITE POSSIBILITIES, SUSTAINABLY DELIVERED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFINITE POSSIBILITIES, SUSTAINABLY DELIVERED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane M. Lambillotte
Diane M. Lambillotte ARENT FOX LLP555 WEST FIFTH STREET, 48TH FLOOR48th FloorLOS ANGELES, CA 90013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded software for use in design and manufacture of vehicles and automobiles; recorded software for use in design and manufacture of industrial goods; downloadable software for use in design and manufacture of vehicles and automobiles; downloadable software for use in design and manufacture of industrial goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Four-wheeled motor vehicles, two-wheeled motor vehicles and structural parts therefor; Automobiles and structural parts therefor; Automobile chassis | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing of automobiles, vehicles, electric vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water; custom additive manufacturing; consulting in the field of manufacturing processes and custom additive manufacturing of automobiles, vehicles, electric vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technology research and consulting in the field of design of vehicles and automobiles and manufacturing equipment therefor; technology research and consulting in the field of technology pertaining to the design, production and manufacture of carbon fiber materials; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in design and manufacture of vehicles and automobiles; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in design and manufacture of industrial goods; consulting in the field of engineering of automobiles, vehicles, electric vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water; custom engineering of automobiles, vehicles, electric vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property in the field of technology related to the engineering, manufacturing and additive manufacturing of automobiles, vehicles, electric vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Divergent Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Divergent Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named INFINITE POSSIBILITIES, SUSTAINABLY DELIVERED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 4, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |