CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MORE THAN A TRIP

USPTO serial 88296044

MORE THAN A TRIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MORE THAN A TRIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard J. Shire

Howard J. Shire Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP620 EIGHTH AVENUETHE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGNEW YORK, NY 10018

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016StickersACTIVE—
018LuggageACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, caps, jackets, footwear, hoodies, shorts, pants and socksACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos, podcasts, films and social media posts all in the field of entertainment and travel informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 16, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 17, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 17, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 7, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance