Drawing for DIGITALMEDIABANK

USPTO serial 88298196

DIGITALMEDIABANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITALMEDIABANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MIYA YUSA

MIYA YUSA POLSINELLI LLPTHREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for securely integrating Internet portal access and datacenters in order to provide users certified media with 3D geographic location information, date and time, title, and group identifiers; Platform as a Service (PaaS) featuring technology for processing, securely transmitting, and certifying images, videos, sound recordings, and other visual media; Computer services, namely, online non-downloadable computer software platforms for securely integrating internet portal access and datacenters in order to provide users certified media with 3D geographic location information, data, and time, title, and group identifiers; Computer services, namely, online non-downloadable computer software technology for processing, securely transmitting, and certifying images, videos, sound recordings, and other visual mediaACTIVEOct 31, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 17, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 17, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 8, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 10, 2021GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Feb 10, 2021GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Feb 10, 2021CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Jan 9, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 8, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 8, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 4, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 4, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 5, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 7, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 7, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 3, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 15, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance