Drawing for +

USPTO serial 88298405

+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with +?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. May

David L. May NIXON PEABODY LLP799 9TH STREET, NW, SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio tapes, discs and cassettes featuring music, entertainment in the nature of musical concerts, and musical sound recordings; Pre-recorded video tapes, discs and cassettes featuring music, entertainment in the nature of musical concerts, and musical sound recordings; prerecorded digital audio and video tapes and discs, CDs, DVDs, laser discs, and phonograph records featuring music, entertainment in the nature of musical concerts, and musical sound recordings; musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; downloadable music files; downloadable computer graphics featuring artists, stories, opinions and content for mobile phones, tablet computers, and computers; downloadable videos featuring music, entertainment in the nature of music concerts, and musical sound recordingsACTIVE—
035Providing online registration services for music competitions; commercial administration of the licensing of musical and non-musical sound recordings of othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 5, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 25, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 13, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 5, 2020IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
May 5, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2020INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Apr 22, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 2, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 1, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance