USPTO serial 88298644
PRIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADEBAYO, OMOLAYO E.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan A. McGonigle
RYAN A MCGONIGLE HODGSON RUSS LLP605 THIRD AVENUESUITE 2300NEW YORK, NY 10158Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dental ceramics; dental ceramics made in whole or in part of zirconia | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 14, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |