Drawing for ORBITAL RAPID RESPONSE

USPTO serial 88299254

ORBITAL RAPID RESPONSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTINS, ODETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORBITAL RAPID RESPONSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robyn A. Shelton

Robyn A. Shelton COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C.625 Liberty AvenuePittsburgh, PA 15222-3152UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, computers and other devices to access construction project management services; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, computers and other devices to communicate with providers of civil, electrical, mechanical and environmental engineering, testing and inspection services; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, computers and other devices to communicate with providers of environmental services with respect to safety and inspection; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, computers and other devices to request inspections of structural, mechanical and electrical assets; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, computers and other devices to communicate with providers of regulatory safety compliance consulting services in the fields of fall protection systems, process safety management, arc flash studies and engineered safety systems; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, computers and other devices to communicate with providers of safety inspection audit services to improve the safety of construction workers on construction sites; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, computers and other devices to communicate with providers of safety consulting services in the fields of hazard assessment and abatement proceduresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance