Drawing for INTELLIGENT ASSAY

USPTO serial 88301042

INTELLIGENT ASSAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRATOS, MARK STEVEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIGENT ASSAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIAN D. GONZALEZ

1 DEERPARK DRIVE, SUITE RMONMOUTH JUNCTION, NJ 08852UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific apparatus and instruments for biochemical or biological testing, biochemical or biological sample processing, scientific research, and laboratory use, namely, apparatus and instruments for performing diagnostic assays; Kits comprising scientific instruments, namely, instruments for performing diagnostic assays for scientific research and laboratory use; Scientific apparatus and instruments for the detection and identification of cells, proteins, small molecules, and nucleotides in a sample using assays or biochemical reactionsACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research in the field of detection and identification of cells, proteins, small molecules, and nucleotides in a sample; Performing medical diagnostic assays and diagnostic testing for medical research purposes in the field of infectious and residual disease, and the analysis, evaluation, and reporting of those test results to help healthcare professionals for research purposes; Development of new technology for others in the fields of biotechnology, DNA, RNA, small molecules, proteins, and nucleotide analysis services for scientific research purposes; Providing medical and scientific research information in the field of clinical trials, assays and assay development, diagnostics, cancer, RNA, DNA, small molecules, proteins, and nucleotides; Research and development in the diagnostics and biotechnology fields; Custom design and development of chemical reagents and biochemical assays; Laboratory research in the field of oncology, hematology, and infectious diseasesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 10, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 13, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 2, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 18, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 17, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 12, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2020PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Aug 10, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 3, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 3, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 6, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance