Drawing for STAR THEORY GAMES

USPTO serial 88303258

STAR THEORY GAMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAR THEORY GAMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert N. Muraski

Robert N. Muraski McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC600 University Street, Suite 2700Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable and recorded computer software and programs for use in data management, downloadable and recorded video game software and programs, downloadable and recorded electronic and mobile computer game applications, and downloadable and recorded electronic and mobile computer applications for data management, all the aforesaid being for use with personal computers, handheld computers, mobile devices, home video game consoles, portable gaming systems, and arcade-based video game consoles; downloadable and recorded computer game software; downloadable and recorded video game softwareACTIVE—
041providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer and video game softwareACTIVE—
042providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for use in data management; computer software development and design in the field of computer games, video games, and electronic and mobile applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 5, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 4, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 7, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 7, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance