USPTO serial 88303884
SKIN SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM MOLESAFE MELANOMA SKIN CANCER EARLY DETECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKIN SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM MOLESAFE MELANOMA SKIN CANCER EARLY DETECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Florham Parl, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Hanamirian
John M. Hanamirian HANAMIRIAN LAW FIRM, P.C.40 E. MAIN STREETMOORESTOWN, NJ 08057UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | cancer screening; dermatology; medical expertise in dermatology; dermatological imaging; skin check; dermoscopic imaging; mole/skin cancer screening; medical services in dermatology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2020 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 21, 2020 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |