Drawing for PRIVICELL

USPTO serial 88304664

PRIVICELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIVICELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adriano Pacifici

Adriano Pacifici INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTING, LLC400 Poydras StreetSuite 1400NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Boxes made primarily of metal and also including plastic, incorporating RFID blocking technology for the purpose of blocking RF signalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2021PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 1, 2021PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 29, 2021ERTITEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER—
Mar 15, 2021ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2021PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 25, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 25, 2021PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 1, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2020PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 30, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance