USPTO serial 88306991
OTTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUKER, RACHEL EVE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OTTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Stuart
SUSAN STUART AEON LAW, PLLC506 2ND AVENUE SUITE 3000SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and recorded software systems for voice command and recognition software, speech to text conversion; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for voice-enabled applications for personal information management; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for personal assistant software; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for wireless communication of for voice, audio, video, and data transmission; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for controlling stand-alone voice controlled information and personal assistant devices; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for personal information management; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for enabling users to analyze medical symptoms and historical health information; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for synchronous and asynchronous communication and for connection of physicians with their patients regardless of medical organization or geographic location; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for use as an application programming interface (API); Computer hardware and recorded software systems for handheld wireless devices, namely, software for controlling, integrating, operating, connecting, and managing voice controlled information devices, namely, cloud-connected and voice-controlled smart consumer electronic devices and electronic personal assistant devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in controlling, integrating, operating, connecting, and managing voice controlled information devices, namely, cloud-connected and voice-controlled smart consumer electronic devices and electronic personal assistant devices; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for facilitating the development of voice service delivery and personal assistant capability tools in connection with consumer electronic devices; Providing customized computer searching services, namely, searching and retrieving information at the customer's specific request via the Internet; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for voice command and recognition software, speech to text conversion software, voice-enabled software applications for personal information management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for personal assistant software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling users to analyze medical symptoms and historical health information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for wireless communication software for voice, audio, video, and data transmission; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for controlling stand-alone voice controlled information and personal assistant devices; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for personal information management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for synchronous and asynchronous communication and for connection of physicians with their patients regardless of medical organization or geographic location; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for accessing, monitoring, tracking, searching, saving, and sharing information on topics of medical information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as an application programming interface (API); Intelligent voice recognition services using cloud-based software technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |