Drawing for PRESCRIPTION AGRONOMICS

USPTO serial 88308911

PRESCRIPTION AGRONOMICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRESCRIPTION AGRONOMICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL E TRAXINGER

908 LAMONT STREET SOUTHABERDEEN, SD 57401-5155UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001fertilizer and fertilizer additivesACTIVE—
044consulting services, namely, the application of fertilizer and fertilizer additives and nutrient management recommendationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2020PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 2, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 26, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 14, 2019PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance