USPTO serial 88309058
CAPITOL FARM SUPPLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 612
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPITOL FARM SUPPLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL E TRAXINGER
908 LAMONT STREET SOUTHABERDEEN, SD 57401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | online retail store services in the field of agricultural, horticultural and farming products; providing an online marketplace for buyers and sellers in the field of agricultural, horticultural and farming products and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | agricultural services, namely, agricultural product and service recommendations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2020 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |