Drawing for PDU

USPTO serial 88311494

PDU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PDU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angel Miguel Munoz, Esq.

Angel Miguel Munoz, Esq. Munoz-Lopez & Associates PLLC305 BroadwaySuite 704New York, NY 10007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; Computer programs, recorded, for use in medical, healthcare, wellness and pharmacy services, namely, for database management; Downloadable computer software for data management, storage and dispensing medication and other pharmaceutical products and instructional user guides sold as a unit; Downloadable computer software for data management, storage and dispensing medication and other pharmaceutical products; Electronic data recorders; Recorded computer software and hardware for data management, storage and dispensing medication and other pharmaceutical products sold as a unit; Recorded computer software for data management, storage and dispensing medication and other pharmaceutical products and instructional user guides sold as a unit; Recorded computer software for data management, storage and dispensing medication and other pharmaceutical productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 27, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 21, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 21, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 19, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 25, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 8, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 8, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 8, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance