Drawing for PHYTOMER

USPTO serial 88312839

PHYTOMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LINDEMYER, ANKHI MUKHERJEA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYTOMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DYAN M HOUSE

DYAN M HOUSE BAKER MCKENZIE LLP1900 NORTH PEARL STREETSUITE 1500DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Biostimulants being plant growth stimulants; Biostimulants being plant hormones; Biostimulants being plant nutrition preparationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 4, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2021TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Oct 20, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 20, 2021OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jan 15, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 15, 2020OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 31, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 31, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 25, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 29, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 29, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 14, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance