USPTO serial 88313142
INTELLICAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLICAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradford C. Weber
BRADFORD C. WEBER BENJAMIN, HEATHER, IACIOFANO & BITTER, LLC300 PIKE STREETSUITE 500CINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio-video receivers; Camera mounts and supports; Infrared detectors; Infrared sensors; Video monitors; Wireless transmitters and receivers; Audio recorders; Body cameras; Camera hardware systems for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; Closed circuit TV systems for security and surveillance, namely, cameras, switchers, monitors, microphones, and recorders; Computer cameras; Computer hardware for IP video surveillance; Dashboard cameras; Day and night vision systems primarily comprising day and night sensors, day and night cameras, power sources, communication means, monitors and operating software; Digital cameras; Digital video cameras; Digital video recorders; Digital voice recorders; Downloadable digital video recording software for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; Downloadable network video recording software for IP (Internet Protocol) video surveillance; Electric and electronic video surveillance installations; Electronic video surveillance products, namely, electronic components of security systems; Electronic switchers for audio and video signals; Flat panel display screens; Infrared cameras; Internet digital video recorders; IP (Internet protocol) cameras; IP (Internet protocol) speed dome cameras; Matrix switchers for audio and video signals; Motion-activated cameras; Mounting devices for cameras and monitors; PC digital video recorders; Remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote location; Video cameras; Video recorders; Wearable cameras | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Infrared illuminators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |