USPTO serial 88315082
GRAPHENO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 2020
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GRAPHENO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann R. O'Neill
Ann R. O'Neill QUINN IP LAW21500 HAGGERTY ROADSUITE 300NORTHVILLE, MI 48167Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Device for the protection of structures from naturally-occurring and manmade electromagnetic pulses that reduces impact of naturally-occurring and manmade electromagnetic pulses through use of a protective field; electromagnetic deflection apparatus for the protection of structures from high density electromagnetic energy that reduces impact of electromagnetic energy through use of a protective field; electromagnetic deflection apparatus for the protection of structures from electromagnetic radiation that reduces impact of electromagnetic radiation through use of a protective field; electromagnetic deflection apparatus for the protection of structures from nuclear electromagnetic pulse that reduces impact of electromagnetic pulses through use of a protective field; electromagnetic deflection apparatus for the protection of structures from electromagnetic energy generated by electromagnetic pulse weaponry that reduces impact of electromagnetic energy through use of a protective field; electromagnetic deflection apparatus for the protection of structures from lightning, solar storms, geomagnetic storms, electrostatic shocks, or other natural phenomena that reduces impact of electromagnetic energy through use of a protective field; electromagnetic pulse arrester; electromagnetic pulse arrester for the protection of structures from high density electromagnetic energy; electromagnetic pulse arrester for the protection of structures from electromagnetic radiation; electromagnetic pulse arrester for the protection of structures from nuclear electromagnetic pulse; electromagnetic pulse arrester for the protection of structures from electromagnetic energy generated by electromagnetic pulse weaponry; electromagnetic pulse arrester for the protection of structures from lightning, solar storms, geomagnetic storms, electrostatic shocks, or other natural phenomena; electromagnetic pulse device that reduces impact of electromagnetic through the use of a protective field; electromagnetic pulse diverter that safely channels electromagnetic pulses through use of a protective field; electromagnetic pulse arrester equipment; lightning arresters; lightning suppressors that reduce impact of charges from lightning through use of a protective field; lightning arrester equipment; lightning rods; lightning conductors; lightning conductor equipment, namely, lightning rods; electrical surge arresters; surge protectors; voltage surge suppressors; voltage surge protectors; measuring, detecting and monitoring instruments, indicators and controllers, namely, electrical controlling devices; instruments for measuring, detecting and monitoring, namely, temperature, level, speed and pressure indicators and power and electrical controllers; electrical devices for data processing in the nature of electronic data processing apparatus; safety, security, protection and signaling devices, namely, flashing and steady safety lights; magnets; demagnetizers for demagnetizing ferrous metal objects | ACTIVE | Aug 26, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 1, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |