Drawing for JUSTICE IS SERVED

USPTO serial 88315364

JUSTICE IS SERVED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUSTICE IS SERVED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

Perry J. Viscounty LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for videogame programming that allows users to create, modify, upload, download, share, preview, and publish user created interactive video game content, music, and other media files; downloadable computer application software for videogame programming that allows users to create, modify, upload, download, share, preview, and publish user created interactive video game content, music, and other media files; downloadable computer game software; downloadable computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Computer peripherals and computer peripheral devices; mouse pads; headphones; headsets for electronic virtual reality sports games; computer bags; downloadable video game programs; downloadable journals in the field of electronic video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 24, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 14, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2019GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2019GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2019EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Nov 14, 2019CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance