USPTO serial 88315379
FRONT 'N' CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2021
- Examiner
- GORAN, BRADLEY TAYLOR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FRONT 'N' CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $325
Owner
Container Graphics & Displays, Inc.
Elmhurst, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by Container Graphics & Displays, Inc.
Container Graphics & Displays, Inc.
Elmhurst, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by Container Graphics & Displays, Inc.
Container Graphics & Displays, Inc.
Elmhurst, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by Container Graphics & Displays, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL T GOLTERMANN
NEIL T GOLTERMANN MOMKUS LLC1001 WARRENVILLE ROADSUITE 500LISLE, IL 60532Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Wheels as an integral component of a retail display unit | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Container Graphics & Displays, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Container Graphics & Displays, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Container Graphics & Displays, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named FRONT 'N' CENTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |