Drawing for JUSTICE IS SERVED

USPTO serial 88315386

JUSTICE IS SERVED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUSTICE IS SERVED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

Perry J. Viscounty LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, games and playthings, namely, toy models, toy aircraft, toy action figures, modeled plastic toy figurines, bobble head dolls, stuffed and plush toys, plush dolls, board games, tabletop games, party games, card games, inflatable novelty noisemaker toys for parties, toy foam novelty items in the nature of foam fingers, and bean bag animals; gymnastic apparatus; sporting articles, namely, baseball bats, bats for games, balls for games, footballs, accessories for playing video sports games, namely, gaming gloves being gloves adapted for use in playing video games and headwear in the nature of gaming headsets adapted for use in playing video games; Plush toys; musical toys; action figure toys; arcade games; role playing games; trading card games; arcade-type electronic video games; game controllers for computer games; video gaming consoles for playing computer games; hand-held units for playing electronic games; gaming headsets adapted for use in playing electronic sports video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance