Drawing for BETTER THAN YESTERDAY

USPTO serial 88317783

BETTER THAN YESTERDAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, MICHAEL J.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BETTER THAN YESTERDAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Nowak

KEITH D. NOWAK CARTER LEDYARD & MILBURN LLP2 WALL STREETNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, t-shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, socks, hats and capsACTIVEJan 1, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 6, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 20, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2019LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Sep 19, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 18, 2019ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Jun 18, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance