CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for AOUXSEEM

USPTO serial 88327245

AOUXSEEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 610
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AOUXSEEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Basins in the nature of bowls; Cleaning cloths; Cookie molds; Cups; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Dishware; Dusting brushes; Household utensils, namely, strainers; Ice cube molds; Insulated flasks; Paper and plastic cupsTERMINATEDFeb 1, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2021KNOTNOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED—
Dec 13, 2021KONOORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED—
Dec 10, 2021KBOCTERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS—
Dec 10, 2021KOFSORDER FOR SANCTIONS—
Feb 26, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2019GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance