USPTO serial 88333121
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Basking Ridge, NJ
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware for connecting, managing, and enabling communication among smartphones, tablets, and devices in a network; computing platform to enable communication of data and collaboration among Internet of Things (IoT) devices over a network; computer software and platform to enable collaboration among Internet of Things (IoT) devices connected in a fog network; software development kit (SDK) comprised of software development tools to enable third parties to create computer software and platform to enable collaboration among Internet of Things (IoT) devices connected in a fog network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development, design, implementation, and maintenance of software and computing platform solutions for connecting and managing smartphones, tablets, and devices in a network; development, design, implementation, and maintenance of software and computing platform solutions to enable communication and collaboration among smartphones, tablets, devices, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices in a fog network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2020 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |