USPTO serial 88333397
DIKASLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIKASLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Belt bags and hip bags; Clutch bags; Cosmetic bags sold empty; Diaper bags; Evening bags; Gym bags; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Messenger bags; Pocket wallets; Reusable shopping bags; School bags; Sling bags for carrying infants; Sports bags; Travelling bags; Backpacks; Briefcases; Handbags; Haversacks; Rucksacks; Suitcases(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Belt bags and hip bags; Clutch bags; Cosmetic bags sold empty; Diaper bags; Evening bags; Gym bags; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Messenger bags; Pocket wallets; Reusable shopping bags; School bags; Sling bags for carrying infants; Sports bags; Travelling bags; Backpacks; Briefcases; Handbags; Haversacks; Rucksacks; Suitcases | ACTIVE | Jan 25, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |