Drawing for V-BAR

USPTO serial 88334089

V-BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, BRIDGET ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V-BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tyler K Berger

Tyler K Berger Berger Law Firm, PLLC3111 N Houston Ave APT PH 5Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable Computer game software; Downloadable computer game programs; Downloadable electronic game programsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer and electronic games through a social networking website; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer game softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2020PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 25, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 13, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 13, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2019WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2019WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2019WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2019WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 10, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 10, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 20, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance