Drawing for BELÓ

USPTO serial 88334846

BELÓ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MALYSZEK, KIMBERLY RAY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BELÓ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID R. WELCH

DAVID R. WELCH D R WELCH ATTORNEYS AT LAW500 S. GRAND AVENUESUITE 1800LOS ANGELES, CA 90071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medical body lotions, balms, facial creams, body creams, massage oil, ointment, gels, all containing CBD (cannabinoids) derived solely from Cannabis sativa L. with less than 0.3% THC on a dry weight basis; Non-medical body lotions, balms, facial creams, body creams, massage oil, ointment, gelsACTIVE—
034Pre-rolled cigarettes, smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipes, electronic cigarettes, oral vaporizers for smoking purposes, electronic vaporizers for smoking purposes, E-vaporizers for smoking purposes, vapes being electronic vaporizers for smoking purposes, electronic-vaporizer juice comprised of propylene glycol, E-juice comprised of propylene glycol, electronic cigarette liquid comprised of propylene glycol, E-liquid comprised of propylene glycol, electronic-vaporizer cartridges sold empty, electronic cigarette cartridges sold empty, E-pens being electronic vaporizers for smoking purposes; all or the forgoing goods sold containing, or for use with, tobacco or CBD derived solely from Cannabis sativa L. with less than 0.3% THC on a dry weight basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2021TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 16, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2021OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 27, 2021OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance