USPTO serial 88338472
AMICUS.IO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMICUS.IO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for processing electronic payments and transferring funds to and from others for charitable fundraising purposes; software for accepting and administering monetary contributions to a donor-advised fund; software for managing charitable fundraiser analytics and tracking payment transactions via electronic communications networks; software for managing and promoting charitable projects and tracking project developments via electronic communications networks; software for use in the banking, financial and investment industries, namely, software for accessing and conducting electronic banking services, software for electronic transfer of funds; software that will allow financial institutions to include charitable giving in their products and services offered to bank customers and donor-advised funds; software that will allow private and public (community) foundations to facilitate on-line giving, donor fund activities (portal) and grant management; software that will allow corporations to engage their employees and customers in charitable activities; software that will allow charities to conduct their operations, namely, receive donations, manage funds, manage, execute and track charitable projects, promote charitable projects; software that will allow charities to thank donors and report back on their activities, impact, and use of charitable donations | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Promoting charitable goods and services of others by an interactive web site | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hosted services, namely, web hosting; on-line services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others; Software as a service (SAAS), namely, hosting software for use by others for processing electronic transactions for charitable purposes; Software as a service (SAAS), namely, hosting software for use by others for processing monetary contributions to a donor-advised fund; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software that allows donors to find, evaluate and select charitable and non-profit organizations and programs for the purpose of providing charitable donations; Software as a service (SAAS), namely, hosting software for use by others for accessing and conducting electronic and mobile banking services and processing electronic transactions; software as a service (SAAS), namely, hosting software for use by others for business process optimization and shared services, namely, software that enables posting of projects available for donation, potential donors to select and finance specific projects, facilitation of procurement of resources for the project and facilitation of project updates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |