Drawing for MICROVERT+

USPTO serial 88342902

MICROVERT+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE-RICHARDSON HA, BRITTANY NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROVERT+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Annette P. Heller

Annette P. Heller HELLER & ASSOCIATES400 CHESTERFIELD CENTERSUITE 400CHESTERFIELD [STLOUIS], MO 63017-4800

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Diverting agents, namely, chemicals in the nature of liquids, gels and solids for use as temporary blocking agents used for fracturing and refracturing operations in the field of oil and gas exploration and productionACTIVESep 24, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 10, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 9, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 6, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2020CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 21, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 29, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 29, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 3, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance