USPTO serial 88344058
RACE21
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NKOJO, RHODA K
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RACE21?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie B. Albert
Julie B. Albert Baker Botts L.L.P.2001 Ross AvenueSuite 900Dallas, TX 75201-2900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for mining and mining automation process, namely, downloadable software for the integration of advanced analytics with autonomous mine equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Technical consulting in the fields of mining extraction and mining extraction automation; Mining extraction of lead, copper, zinc, germanium, indium, cadmium, silver, molybdenum, and metallurgical and thermal coal provided via robotics; Providing information in the field of mining extraction, namely, information concerning mining extraction automation, operations, and technological advancements and innovations over a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development in the fields of mining and mining automation; Platform as a service featuring computer software platforms for real time analysis and control of assets and mining logistical operations in the fields of mining and mining automation; Application service provider, namely, hosting a digital platform comprised of applications, software and web sites for others in the fields of mining and mining automation; Mining exploration services in the field of lead, copper, zinc, germanium, indium, cadmium, silver, molybdenum, and metallurgical and thermal coal provided via robotics; Providing information in the field of mining exploration, namely, information concerning mining exploration automation, operations and technological advancements and innovations over a global computer network; Technical consulting in the field of mining exploration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |