Drawing for Serial No. 88344068

USPTO serial 88344068

Serial No. 88344068

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NKOJO, RHODA K
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 88344068?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Burke

John M. Burke CASEIRO BURKE LLCP.O. BOX 610SCARBOROUGH, ME 04070UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for use in automotive voice control systems, smart speakers, appliances, hearing assistance apparatuses, mobile phones and televisions, namely, for executing blind source separation; Recorded software for use in automotive voice control systems, smart speakers, appliances, hearing assistance apparatuses, mobile phones and televisions, namely, for executing blind source separationACTIVEMar 24, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2022SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2022IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 22, 2022EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 16, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 3, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 3, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 16, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 3, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 22, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 23, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 30, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 5, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 5, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance